How Does the Bible Authorize?
Saturday, April 16, 2011 at 12:51 PM HOW DOES THE BIBLE AUTHORIZE?
David Sain
The Need For This Study
In recent years, the landscape of religion has undergone numerous changes, including such things as the use of pragmatic methods of evangelism, the shift from the traditional to a contemporary style of worship, and the sanctioning of appointing gay people to positions of leadership in denominations. In my judgment, all of these and other unscriptural changes are the result of a growing disregard for the authority of the Bible. And, regrettably, I have witnessed this growing disregard for the Word of God among my brethren in the churches of Christ.When I first began preaching the prevailing sentiment in the average listener was, “Well, if that is what the Bible says, that settles the matter.” Now, however, the alarming and growing sentiment is, “Well, I know the Bible says that, but …” At that point, the listener’s subjectivity takes over and he begins to interject his personal point of view instead of submissively accepting what the Bible says.
As we witness the changes that are taking place in religion and we ponder where all of this will lead, it is vital to know the role that the Bible plays and how we should regard it. Some view the Bible as a devotional guide. Some view it as a source of comfort and consolation in times of sorrow and distress. Some view it as a collection of ancient literature that is “out of date” and irrelevant to modern man. Some people say the Bible is the Word of God, while others think it only contains the Word of God (unwilling to accept the accuracy of everything in it, and unwilling to believe that every word of it is inspired of God). So, how should we view the Bible? Here are two answers to that important question.
We Should View the Bible as the Word of God
Inspired writers, in thousands of verses, affirmed this to be the case. Jeremiah did so nearly five hundred times in his two Old Testament books. Ezekiel did so more than three hundred times in his book. Zechariah did so more than eighty times in his book of prophecy. And on and on the list goes. The Bible declares that God spoke by the prophets. David said, “The Spirit of Jehovah spake by me, and his word was upon my tongue” (2 Sam. 23:2). Jeremiah recorded that God spoke unto him, saying, “Behold, I have put my words in thy mouth” (Jer. 1:9). Throughout the pages of the Bible we are told, “thus saith the Lord” (e.g., Isa. 45:11; Jer. 17:5; Ezek. 2:4). In the New Testament we are assured that God has spoken to us through His Son (Heb. 1:1-2).Jesus told his disciples,
19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.20 For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you.(Matt. 10:19-20)
In further instruction to the apostles, Jesus promised,But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.(John 14:26)
When Paul wrote the Corinthians he affirmed inspiration, declaring, “…we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth…” (1 Cor. 2:13). And that, of course, was a fulfillment of the promise of Jesus that the Spirit would teach all things and bring all things to their remembrance.
We Should View the Bible as Authoritative
If one accepts the above affirmation that the scriptures are inspired of God, then one would, logically, conclude that the scriptures are authoritative — simply because they come from the one in whom all authority resides (1 Cor. 11:1). Surely, no one would argue that God could give his word and that his word would be powerless. I repeat. If the Bible is inspired of God, then it is his word - the Word of God - and that means that the Bible is authoritative. The authority of God’s word is indicated in the writing of the apostle Paul when he said to the Galatians,But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.(Gal. 1:8)
Since Paul’s words were by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 2:13), his words became the standard of authority by which the Galatians were to measure what was preached to them. The well-known words of John also indicate the authority of the word of God. He wrote,9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.(2 John 9-11)
As previously noted, the Hebrew writer declared that God has spoken unto us, in these last days, by his Son (Heb. 1:1-2), and Jesus said that whatever he spoke came from the Father (John 17:8, 14). That is why John said the “doctrine of Christ” was the standard by which we are to measure that which is preached. Indeed, the Bible, being the Word of God, should be viewed as authoritative.
By What Authority?
23 And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority? 24 And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things. 25 The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him? 26 But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet. 27 And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.(Matthew 21:23-27)
The question asked in this narrative, in verse 23, emphasizes an important matter for us: Everything we do and teach religiously is either by divine authority or by human authority. The reason that the question of Matthew 21:23 is so crucial is that God has made it abundantly clear that only that which he has authorized is acceptable unto him. The scriptures are replete with teaching and examples of this truth. Note three examples:1. King Saul was commanded to utterly destroy the Amalekites and not bring back any spoil. Yet, Saul and the people defied the Lord’s instructions and brought back spoil. When confronted about their disobedience, Saul attempted to justify their behavior by saying that their intention was to offer a sacrifice unto the Lord. Samuel’s response to Saul teaches us that the only way to please God is to do only that which he has authorized.
And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.(1 Sam. 15:22)
2. Jehovah’s reaction to the behavior of two of the sons of Aaron also illustrates the importance of doing only that which the Lord has authorized. Recall the well-known story of their disobedience and punishment:
1 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not. 2 And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.(Leviticus 10:1-2)
3. Jesus taught that one must do the will of the Father in order to enter into the kingdom of heaven. He taught that being religious does not, within itself, make one acceptable unto God.21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.(Matthew 7:21-23)
Although one may be very devout and do all sorts of good works in the name of the Lord, his devotion and religious deeds, although done in the name of the Lord, will be rejected on the day of judgment if he has done that which is unauthorized.
We Receive Divine Authority Through the Bible
Having established the importance of having divine authority for all that we teach and practice, let us turn our attention directly to the matter of how we receive authority from God.As previously discussed and affirmed, the Bible is inspired of God. Paul wrote:
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.(2 Timothy 3:16-17)
Since the Scriptures are inspired of God, it is correct to say that the Scriptures are the Word of God – the Bible is the Word of God. And, whatever the Bible says to be the case is what God says to be the case. Therefore, whatever the Bible authorizes is that which God authorizes.
Rightly Dividing the Word
The Bible records God’s dealings with man in three dispensations: the Patriarchal age (from creation until the giving of the law through Moses), the Mosaical age (from the giving of the law through Moses until the death of Jesus on the cross), and the Christian age (from the death of Jesus until the end of time). The student of the Bible must be careful to interpret scripture in light of the law that was in force at the time.
We live under and are subject to the law of Christ (Heb. 1:1-2). We are not subject to the laws given during the Patriarchal or Mosaical dispensations. However, there are some laws enjoined during prior dispensations that are also given in the Christian age. To those laws, we are, of course, subject.
How the Bible Authorizes
Divine authority is established in three different ways: direct statement, example, and inference (or implication). In other words, everything that we are authorized to teach or do is authorized in one of those three ways, or we have no divine authority for teaching it or doing it.
Let us now consider each of these three means of authorization, illustrating each of them with Scriptures about baptism.
Direct Statement.
1. This may be in the form of an imperative sentence. To illustrate, note the divinely inspired words of Peter,
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.(Acts 2:38.)
We understand that Peter’s statement in this scripture is an imperative sentence - he commanded repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus Christ! Since he spoke by the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:1-4), his words are divinely authorized and they, thereby, provide authority from God for us to teach and practice baptism in the name of Jesus, for the forgiveness of sins. 2. The direct statement may be in the form of a declarative sentence. To illustrate, note the words of Christ, in the great commission:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.(Mark 16:15-16)
The words of Jesus in verse sixteen are a declarative sentence – he declared that the one who believes (the gospel) and is baptized is the one who shall be saved. Being God (as well as man) the words he spoke establish divine authority regarding baptism being essential to salvation. Therefore, we have authority from God to teach and practice baptism as a prerequisite to salvation. 3. The direct statement may be in the form of an interrogative sentence. To illustrate, consider what Paul wrote to the Romans:Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?(Romans 6:3)
We understand that Paul’s statement in this scripture is an interrogative sentence - he asked a rhetorical question! In the question, he taught that baptism puts one into Jesus Christ. And, like the apostle Peter, Paul spoke by the gift of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 2:9-13). Therefore, his words are divinely authorized and they give to us authority from God to teach and practice baptism as the act that puts one into Christ, where salvation is obtained (2 Tim. 2:10).
Example
Where the Bible records an example of someone doing what God has authorized, that example is authoritative, and may be used to teach the truth regarding the matter that is therein depicted. To cite a case in point, the narrative of the Ethiopian Eunuch being taught and baptized by Philip, the evangelist, illustrates one being baptized in response to the teaching of Jesus (Mark 16:15-16). Therefore, this story can be cited as divine authority in teaching and practicing baptism.
Inference or Implication When a direct statement is made (in the form of an imperative sentence, a declarative sentence, or interrogative sentence), the statement may be explicit and/or implicit. And from that which is stated explicitly, there may be certain things implied. And one draws logical conclusions about what is authorized from that which is implied. For example, being baptized in water necessarily infers, and therefore authorizes, having a place where there is enough water to immerse a person. That, in turn, infers and, thereby, authorizes (but not necessarily so), having that water in a baptistry inside the church building. However, having a baptistry is not a necessary inference. Having a place with enough water to immerse is a necessary inference, but the location of that water is a matter of judgment and expediency.
Specific and Generic Authority
When a direct statement or command is given, in any of the forms mentioned, we have divine authority. If God specifies how, or when, or where, or why to do the command, then we have specific authority. If he does not specify how, or when, or where, or why to do the command, we still have authority, but it is generic authority. As already noted, when God commands us to do something, a part of the command may be specific in nature while another part of the command may be generic in nature. Let me illustrate with a well- known Old Testament event.
When God instructed Noah to build the ark, he was both specific and generic in the commands (Genesis 6). For example, he told Noah to construct it out of wood, and he specified the kind of wood.
From this we have correctly understood and taught that when God specified gopher wood that only that which was specified was authorized, and all other types of wood were unauthorized.
However, the specific command to build the ark out of gopher wood also involved generic authority, because God did not specify anything about the procurement of the wood, or the length of each piece of wood. Those matters were left to Noah’s judgment.
Turning to the New Testament, consider how the great commission also illustrates generic and specific authority.
Jesus commanded “go,” but did not specify how to go, leaving man to choose the most expedient means of going. However, what is to be done is specified, namely “preaching.” And what is to be preached is specified. He commanded that the gospel be preached (Mk. 16:15).
Then Jesus said that the one who believes (the gospel) and is baptized shall be saved (Mk. 16:16). Now, in the context of this study, note that the Bible specifies the why of baptism. The reason –the purpose- of baptism is “for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38). Unless baptism is for that purpose, it is not Biblical baptism.
Music in Worship
Also, from the New Testament, Christians are taught to sing in worship to God (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16). In other chapters of this book, you will find a more detailed treatment of this matter, but, in the immediate context of this chapter, it seems expedient to make a brief application of this injunction as a further illustration of specific and generic authority.
In each of the scriptures cited, Paul specifically commanded “singing,” which authorizes a particular kind of music (namely, vocal). And that specific command would exclude authority for any other kind of music. (Compare the specific command to build the ark out of gopher wood, which excluded using any other kind of wood.)
So we conclude, in accordance with what Paul wrote, that vocal music, congregational in style, is divinely authorized for Christian worship. And that is the only kind of music for which there is Biblical authority in Christian worship. There is no authority in the New Testament for mechanical music in worship to God.
Illustration from Daily Life
A father may say to his son, “Bring me a box.” With no further instruction, the son can meet his father’s request by bringing him any kind and any size of box. However, if the father were to say, “Bring me a cardboad box,” we would immediately understand that the specification of a “cardboard box” automatically excludes a box of any other material. The son does not have to be told not to bring a wooden or plastic box.
What if the father were to say, bring me a brown cardboard box from the closet in the hallway? If that were the case, a blue box is not authorized and a metal box is not authorized. And a box from any other place, other than the closet in the hallway, would be unauthorized. However, since the father did not specify the size of the box, the son would be free to use his judgment as to what size to choose.
We make numerous applications of the principle of generic and specific authority in daily life. And this principle, properly applied to our study of the Bible, will serve us well, and will settle a lot of misunderstandings and controversies regarding salvation, the church, and acceptable worship.
Guidelines
In summary, here are five guidelines that can be helpful in interpreting God’s Word:
- If God has been specific (explicit) about a matter, that which he has specified is required. Everything else, of the same kind, about which he has been specific, is unauthorized, unless expressly authorized elsewhere.
- If God has not been specific about some matter, that about which hehas not been specific is left to human judgment.
- When an action is authorized, everything that is essential or expedient to carrying out that action is authorized unless:
- It is expressly forbidden elsewhere.
- It violates other Biblical teaching.
- It changes, or adds to, the action that is authorized.
- It is wrong to “loose” what God has “bound,” (i.e., not to require what God has required).
- It is wrong to “bind” what God has “loosed” (i.e., to require what God has not required).
